top of page
For decades, scholars and commentators have lamented the fragilities of the space(s) where citizens can engage, coordinate, and shape political meaning – a crucial foundation for a stable democracy. Yet what does a concept, dating back to Habermas’s ‘bourgeois public sphere’ of the eighteenth century, mean in contemporary vernacular? Given the transformations in communication networks brought about by technological change, have we come to terms with the new criteria for a ‘public voice’? Do normative ideals about a thriving political public sphere need updating? Do analytic concepts (framing, gatekeeping, agenda setting) still work or do they need to be reconsidered or completely refurbished? And what can be offered by citizen-led processes of democratic renewal?
This APSA-funded workshop is co-hosted by two Research Centres conducting theoretical and empirical research on the public sphere(s) – the University of Canberra’s Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance, and QUT’s Digital Media Research Centre.
Bringing together postgraduate students and early career researchers with leading scholars in the field, the workshop addresses challenges and threats facing the contemporary public sphere(s) in Australia and beyond. It aims to activate a dynamic interdisciplinary network of scholars working in to explore ways in which the public sphere(s) might be ‘future-proofed’ to integrate and harness the affordances of digital technologies while still facilitating normatively desirable outcomes for vibrant democracies.
The workshop format is designed to offer participants the opportunity to receive detailed feedback from leading experts on works in progress, with the aim of assisting participants to convert their draft papers into a publication.
We are delighted to welcome scholars working on the broad concept of the public sphere from a variety of methodological perspectives and offering theoretical and empirical insights.
Adele Webb (UC) & Katharina Esau (QUT)
Workshop Co-Convenors
Programme
ProgAnchor
Programme highlights
Prog highlights
-
Paper presenters have 8 minutes to present a synopsis of their papers. Please make sure that you stick to this timing. PowerPoint slides are welcome, but not required, and we recommend no more than 5 slides.
-
Designed as an alternative to conference-style paper presentations, presentation of paper synopses should be structured around answering three broad questions: What is the core argument of the paper? What data is being used to support the argument? What are the implications of the research for the field?
-
More in-depth discussion and feedback of each paper is available through the mentoring sessions. Each participant has been assigned two mentors who will read and prepare comments on the paper before the workshop. Over the course of the workshop there is time allocated for these one-on-one-discussions of the papers, which could include feedback on the substantive content, as well as tips on how to get the paper ready for publication, and which journals to consider for submission. We understand the papers are works-in-progress, so feedback will be friendly, encouraging, and constructive.
-
The panel discussions are organised under specific themes and will start with short opening remarks by each of the panel speakers, followed by an open and collective discussion with all workshop participants.
-
The processing and reflection session on day 2 is designed to break participants into small groups, in which participants are encouraged to collectively reflect on mentor feedback, share personal reflections on workshop discussions, and together write down three words/phrases that speak to future research agenda(s). There will be a chance to discuss these with the larger group in the final session.
-
Venue: All activities will take place at the Kelvin Grove campus of QUT in Brisbane (Level 5, E-Block, located at the back of the Library).
-
Registration: If possible, please arrive between 9:30-9:45am on 21 March.
Papers
Papers
bottom of page